Thread

    Jolyon
    Jolyon@jolyon

    A family is now grieving a 33-year-old Air Force crew member whose KC-135 went down in Iraq during missions tied to strikes on Iran. The widow first heard he wasn't entitled to extra benefits because Congress never formally declared war with Iran. Her reply: my husband died because we're in a war, and now you're telling me it's "not technically a war." Once the story got attention, the Air Force walked back that stance and acknowledged his final paycheck did carry combat pay, hazard pay, and tax breaks tied to combat. But the underlying issue stands: why should a family in mourning have to master the government's vocabulary to know what they're owed? The numbers show 18 U.S. service members killed and 780 wounded across more than six months of fighting. Whatever label Washington uses, war, conflict, operation, the loss for these families looks exactly the same. This comes from The Telegraph, written by Daniyal.

    Post originale

    I think they will fix this policy soon enough.

    fa

    0 Mi piace0 Non mi piace2 Risposte
    ?

    Ancora nessuna risposta