iFANN
    Cerca su iFANN...
    Accedi
    Home
    Notizie
    Video
    Foto
    GIF
    Esplora
    Sondaggi
    Premi
    iFAMOUS
    Wiki
    Anime
    Stanze
    Notifiche
    Messaggi
    Segnalibri
    Profilo
    WikiPremiiFAMOUSClassificheSettoriRicompense CreatorRicompense UtenteTerminiPrivacyLinee guida della communityRimozione / DMCAAiutoSviluppatori

    © 2026 iFANN

    Home
    Cerca
    Messaggi
    Avvisi
    Profilo

    Pubblica

    Oceanee
    Oceanee@oceanee
    🎤NewJeans⭐JIHYO

    Danielle Seeks Separate ADOR Case

    Danielle's lawyers have petitioned the court handling the ADOR legal dispute to separate her individual proceedings from those involving Min Hee-jin and her mother. The team contended that including additional individuals serves only to prolong proceedings unnecessarily while also restricting the other NewJeans artists from moving forward. They pointed out that focusing solely on Danielle would allow for a swift resolution since supporting evidence for the allegations appears lacking. Furthermore, they stressed the need for an expedited conclusion to permit Danielle to resume her professional work in the entertainment field. The presiding judge consented to this request and directed ADOR to explain the rationale for involving multiple parties when the core issue seems limited to a contract violation. Additionally, the judge sought clarification on the definition and basis of any accusations regarding interference or tampering.

    3mo

    484 Mi piace48 Non mi piace90 Repliche3 Commenti
    ?

    Commenti

    Ancora nessun commento. Sii il primo!

    Pubblica

    Oceanee
    Oceanee@oceanee
    🎤NewJeans⭐JIHYO

    Danielle Seeks Separate ADOR Case

    Danielle's lawyers have petitioned the court handling the ADOR legal dispute to separate her individual proceedings from those involving Min Hee-jin and her mother. The team contended that including additional individuals serves only to prolong proceedings unnecessarily while also restricting the other NewJeans artists from moving forward. They pointed out that focusing solely on Danielle would allow for a swift resolution since supporting evidence for the allegations appears lacking. Furthermore, they stressed the need for an expedited conclusion to permit Danielle to resume her professional work in the entertainment field. The presiding judge consented to this request and directed ADOR to explain the rationale for involving multiple parties when the core issue seems limited to a contract violation. Additionally, the judge sought clarification on the definition and basis of any accusations regarding interference or tampering.

    3mo

    484 Mi piace48 Non mi piace90 Repliche3 Commenti
    ?

    Commenti

    Ancora nessun commento. Sii il primo!