iFANN
    Cerca su iFANN...
    Accedi
    Home
    Notizie
    Video
    Foto
    GIF
    Esplora
    Sondaggi
    Premi
    iFAMOUS
    Wiki
    Anime
    Stanze
    Notifiche
    Messaggi
    Segnalibri
    Profilo
    WikiPremiiFAMOUSClassificheSettoriRicompense CreatorRicompense UtenteTerminiPrivacyLinee guida della communityRimozione / DMCAAiutoSviluppatori

    © 2026 iFANN

    Home
    Cerca
    Messaggi
    Avvisi
    Profilo

    Pubblica

    Vojtech
    Vojtech@vojtech
    🏢Microsoft🏛️MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology📱Kimi K3

    Loop vs graph agents explained

    Your agent keeps forgetting everything between runs, and that's the real bottleneck. A loop-based setup gives the agent a goal and lets it figure things out, which works for fresh problems but falls apart when you repeat the same task. A graph instead structures the work as connected facts the agent moves through, so knowledge builds up instead of resetting to zero. It's more effort upfront, but you never start from nothing again. The loop forgets, the graph accumulates. That's the actual unlock: organize what you know as relationships rather than loose files, and a smaller model moving through a clean graph beats a bigger one searching through raw text. Microsoft, Stanford, and MIT all confirmed this independently. Kimi K3 fits the role: a million tokens of context can handle an entire reasoning path at once, at a third of the cost of frontier models. When a loop stops teaching you anything new, freeze it into a graph. So which one is your stack actually running?

    2mo

    0 Mi piace0 Non mi piace0 Repliche0 Commenti
    ?

    Commenti

    Ancora nessun commento. Sii il primo!

    Pubblica

    Vojtech
    Vojtech@vojtech
    🏢Microsoft🏛️MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology📱Kimi K3

    Loop vs graph agents explained

    Your agent keeps forgetting everything between runs, and that's the real bottleneck. A loop-based setup gives the agent a goal and lets it figure things out, which works for fresh problems but falls apart when you repeat the same task. A graph instead structures the work as connected facts the agent moves through, so knowledge builds up instead of resetting to zero. It's more effort upfront, but you never start from nothing again. The loop forgets, the graph accumulates. That's the actual unlock: organize what you know as relationships rather than loose files, and a smaller model moving through a clean graph beats a bigger one searching through raw text. Microsoft, Stanford, and MIT all confirmed this independently. Kimi K3 fits the role: a million tokens of context can handle an entire reasoning path at once, at a third of the cost of frontier models. When a loop stops teaching you anything new, freeze it into a graph. So which one is your stack actually running?

    2mo

    0 Mi piace0 Non mi piace0 Repliche0 Commenti
    ?

    Commenti

    Ancora nessun commento. Sii il primo!